000			03832cam a22002658i 4500
003			CY-PaNEU
005			20240801143503.0
008			210917s2021 enk 001 0 eng
020			_a9781108840620
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dCY-PaNEU
050	0	4	_aKZ6471 _b.B469 2021
100	1		_aBerkes, Antal _914005
245	1	0	_aInternational human rights law beyond state territorial control / _cAntal Berkes
264		1	_aNew York, NY: _bCambridge University Press; _c2021.
300			_axxi 364 p, _c24 cm.
490	0		_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _v156
500			_aBased on author's thesis (doctoral - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, 2015) issued under title: Grey zones: the protection of human rights in areas out of the effective control of the state.
504			_aIncludes bibliographic references and index.
520			_a"The book grapples with the applicability and application of international human rights law in geographic areas where the State that is recognised as the sovereign of the territory (territorial State) has lost effective control over a part of its territory. Such a situation raises difficult questions in terms of the applicability of international law and international human rights law, especially since the latter traditionally imposes obligations on the territorial State, presumed as exercising effective control over its entire territory,The book grapples with the applicability and application of international human rights law in geographic areas where the State that is recognised as the sovereign of the territory (territorial State) has lost effective control over a part of its territory. Such a situation raises difficult questions in terms of the applicability of international law and international human rights law, especially since the latter traditionally imposes obligations on the territorial State, presumed as exercising effective control over its entire territory, while it does not foresee express provisions in situations where the territorial State has lost control over part of its territory. This does not mean that these situations bring about an international regulatory vacuum. In fact, other actors exercise effective control over the territory of which obligations are not expressly addressed by international human rights law instruments. These actors include other States (outside States) controlling the territory in an invasion phase; situations of belligerent occupation; territorial lease; international organisations in peace operations, especially within the framework of an international territorial administration; and non-state de facto regimes, issued from an armed group consolidating its effective territorial control. while it does not foresee express provisions in situations where the territorial State has lost control over part of its territory. This does not mean that these situations bring about an international regulatory vacuum. In fact, other actors exercise effective control over the territory of which obligations are not expressly addressed by international human rights law instruments. These actors include other States (outside States) controlling the territory in an invasion phase; situations of belligerent occupation; territorial lease; international organisations in peace operations, especially within the framework of an international territorial administration; and non-state de facto regimes, issued from an armed group consolidating its effective territorial control"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		7	_aHumanitarian law _2 _914007
650		7	_aMilitary occupation. _2 _914008
650		7	_aNon-state actors (International relations) _2 _914009
830			_aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ; _914006
942			_cBK
999			_c6585 _d6585